home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
091994
/
0919640.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-01-31
|
6KB
|
120 lines
<text id=94TT1257>
<title>
Sep. 19, 1994: Essay:Hiroshima and the Time Machine
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
Sep. 19, 1994 So Young to Kill, So Young to Die
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
ESSAY, Page 94
Hiroshima and the Time Machine
</hdr>
<body>
<p>By Lance Morrow
</p>
<p> One morning in Hiroshima, I watched as hundreds of Japanese
schoolchildren--a newly minted generation in their navy-and-white
uniforms--poured out of the Peace Memorial Museum. The Japanese
authorities take children there every day, busload after busload,
to see the evidence: the photographs taken on Aug. 6, 1945,
and the days afterward; the drawings that the child survivors
made to show what they had seen; the blinding thousand-sun light;
the river choked with bodies; the melted clocks; the nuclear
soot that fell upon the city--"black rain." These sights are
implanted in the minds of today's Japanese children as What?
Warning? Against what exactly? Accusation? Against whom precisely?
</p>
<p> Now it is common for Japanese children to practice their English
on the gaijin, and seeing me outside the museum, a little boy
danced up, peered into my face and said brightly, "Murderer!
Hello!"
</p>
<p> I thought of the Japanese schoolboy in recent months as Washington's
Smithsonian Institution shuffled through one script after another,
trying to figure out how to deal with Hiroshima in a 50th-anniversary
exhibition about the end of the war and the dawn of the nuclear
era. Around the Smithsonian, the task brought on profound moral
discomfort--historiographical hives.
</p>
<p> The first script for the exhibition, which will display a part
of the reassembled Enola Gay, was way left of the mark. It interpreted
Hiroshima and Nagasaki in a way that managed to transport a
righteous '60s moral stance on Viet Nam ("Baby killers!") back
in time to portray the Japanese as more or less innocent victims
of American beastliness and lust for revenge. As if the Japanese
had been conquering Asia by Marquess of Queensbury rules. The
curators said to the American public, "Murderer! Hello!"
</p>
<p> The spirit of the, er, text struck some Americans who had the
advantage of having been there at the time as a revisionist
travesty. The curators seemed to be confused about who started
the war and who pursued it (in China, the Philippines and elsewhere)
with relentless inhumanity. To turn the Japanese into the victims
of World War II, and the Americans into the villains, seemed
an act of something worse than ignorance; it had the ring of
a perverse generational upsidedownspeak and Oedipal lese majeste
worthy of a fraud like Oliver Stone.
</p>
<p> The anger of World War II veterans and others who knew what
they were talking about descended upon the Smithsonian. The
curators produced a revised script earlier in the summer and
last week a third try, which finally puts Hiroshima and Nagasaki
into the historical context of Japanese aggression and its many
victims and of a long and vastly destructive war.
</p>
<p> Of course, the metaphysics is confusing. Hiroshima, introducing
the nuclear age, lifted war out of its traditional (and more
or less manageable) place in human affairs and into a realm
of the absolute, of doomsday.
</p>
<p> When the Italian author Primo Levi was in Auschwitz, a guard
told him, "Hier ist kein warum." (Here is no why.) He was right.
That was the terror, the mystery and the evil.
</p>
<p> But you have to make distinctions, even--or especially--when using the vocabularies of seeming absolutes. At Hiroshima
there was, precisely, a warum, an excellent why.
</p>
<p> To understand the reason, it may be necessary to climb into
a time machine, to return to the moment. Events occur in contexts.
At the time, it seemed that nothing less than such a devastation
would serve to eradicate a Japanese militarist regime that had
killed infinitely more innocent civilians than died on those
two nuclear mornings. The scales of death were pretty heavy,
well before the Bomb. Four months earlier, Americans suffered
48,000 casualties taking Okinawa. And in March 1945, the incendiary-
bomb raids had burned down much of Tokyo and killed at least
100,000, a toll approaching the combined carnage at Hiroshima
and Nagasaki. To have possessed a weapon that would end such
a war almost instantly and not to have used it would have been
inexplicable and, to those who would have died in the longer
war, inexcusable.
</p>
<p> It is possible in hindsight to entertain hypothetical doubt
about whether an invasion of the Japanese home islands would
have been absolutely necessary at that stage of the war. Perhaps
the Japanese would have submitted, although nothing in experience
predicted that. One may argue whether the nuclear bombs really
saved a million or two or more lives, Japanese and American,
that might have been lost in a protracted endgame. But sometimes
hindsight is decadent and a little fatuous.
</p>
<p> Last week, a couple of days after the Smithsonian released its
third Hiroshima script, Elie Wiesel was speaking in Washington
at the new U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. He was addressing
120 teenagers from five Middle Eastern countries who had spent
a summer session at a Maine camp in the "Seeds of Peace" program.
A Palestinian boy in the program minimized the Jews' Holocaust
under the Nazis and said bitterly, thinking of his own people,
"There are many holocausts!"
</p>
<p> Elie Wiesel embraced the boy and told him, "Don't compare! Don't
compare! All suffering is intolerable."
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>